ANOTHER-BLENDED NOT SHAKEN
STILL true today as it was when my column first appeared in the Denver Post 1997 and when I published the 1st edition in 2002 - half of the recorded marriages in North America are actually 're'marriages...
Blended Families are like a giant self-stitching quilt with many emotional patterns and colored histories from former relationships - as divorced parents remarry, merging them, their children, grandparents and so much more. That's still the 'good news'.
The not-so-good news is these 'next' marriages end in an appalling divorce rate that averages 64%. [Third marriages are off the charts at a failure rate of 72%]. Ironically second marriages need not suffer this devastating breakdown if as a culture we understood and addressed what is required of these uniquely stressful - but opportune relationships.
PEEK @...Introduction
This book is not the
result of a formal clinical study, nor an accumulation of case histories
gathered by a practicing professional therapist.
This 2nd
edition [like the 1st] is entirely the result of a twenty-six year slice-of-our-life served with garnishes from the lives of other
blended-families.
It’s how we came
together with a firsthand candid look at the lessons we learned with what
worked - and often - what did not.
Any helpful published information
readily available to stepfamilies up to the last few years of the 20thCentury was sparse, fractured and so poorly marketed it was almost invisible.
As invisible as the issue of divorce and remarriage – so common we took it for
granted.And so common not even
the people living with the added
strain caused by remarriage with children, recognized that their plight should
have been considered a cultural crisis.
Each new remarried couple struggled in silent
isolation convinced they were alone with their specific problems - sure their
questions, their confusion, their fear and frustrations were unique - only to
them.
The vulnerability of each
[step]blended-family became [an unconscious]
conspiracy of silence – borne from the original shame a failed marriage once carried
and for many, still does.
Divorce among original
marriages remains steady at 41 to 44% [depending on region]
but other social changes have escalated. In 1976 - 61% of
original families had one parent at home with their offspring. By 2009 a parent
at home full time was an endangered species that existed in only 27% of
original households.
With university student
loans forcing both parents to work and second [& third]
marriages crumbling often within months of the spoken vows, family-structure teeters.So as the first day of
the New Year dawned on millions of blended-families facing 2016 the harvest of seven decades of a family-unit-shift,
looked daunting.
In 1990 my husband and
I were basically green – learning as
we went. Not green as parents, but literally learning what it took to be
effective stepparents as we went. But
certainly not experienced enough to field calls from our kid’s teachers about what we were doing, or other remarried
parents seeking advice from us.
At the time, still
actively writing columns and features for magazines and newspapers my
journalistic curiosity vis-à-vis my new parenting role kicked in. I went hunting..
I was sure there had to be several how-to books and published essays in journals by experts offering at least a glimpse of issues faced by remarrying parents. What my research produced by 1993 was almost zip, zilch, nada. There was a chapter here and there in university doctorial studies or a mention in obscure chapters as part of a larger published social study – but generally not much specifically targeted to and for the blended-family.Then too certainly nothing from any first person perspective – which made finding anything presented with practicality or humor ranking right up there with mermaid sightings.
I was sure there had to be several how-to books and published essays in journals by experts offering at least a glimpse of issues faced by remarrying parents. What my research produced by 1993 was almost zip, zilch, nada. There was a chapter here and there in university doctorial studies or a mention in obscure chapters as part of a larger published social study – but generally not much specifically targeted to and for the blended-family.Then too certainly nothing from any first person perspective – which made finding anything presented with practicality or humor ranking right up there with mermaid sightings.
However, what my
research uncovered represented the tip of a cosmic pyramid almost completely
covered by the cultural sands of lethargy. Identifying a hidden and
unidentified puzzle spurred me to share our experiences in my Denver Post
weekly column later assembled and published in my 1st edition.
All of the hurdles and
resulting solutions presented are from firsthand experiences. The
recommendations offered may have merit for your blended-family – or not. They
aren’t intended as the answer or
solution for your issues – but as a place from which you might start.
These ideas may need to
be modified to fit your circumstances as each and every blended-family – like
each and every snowflake – is unique.
In my Denver Post
column and with both editions of this book I deliberately avoid using the term
‘step’ [anything]
whenever possible. Blending is our ultimate goal and I see that term as
proactive and positive. Step still
implies separation.
…ohhh, and what was it we had done? Meals! We ate meals
together – evening meals during the week and at least breakfast on the weekends.
We often prepared them together and when we ate those meals we shared our opinions,
we shared our plans and we shared our day…
PART
I
THE
OPPORTUNITY
Too many of us grew up
with no idea of what a strong marriage, or any balanced relationship really
was. So, we settled. We had only the foggiest idea of what we were doing, so we
got foggy marriages. However – it is possible to find a solid team-mate!
While tackling some typical
pre-marriage misconceptions made by the majority of divorced parents, please
keep in mind I’m not able to write this because I managed to do ohhh so many
things correctly – I’m able to write this from having done ohhh so many things that
required correction.
THE REALITY FABLE…
Once upon a time – they
all live happily ever after…
And this believe it or not pretty well sums
up our collective grasp on the reality of second marriages with children –
otherwise known as the Blended-Family. Because, even now, we still
expect to “live happily ever after” across the street from The Brady Bunch.
With this mindset we
inadvertently set ourselves up for unrealistic expectations based upon the same
parameters of the typical first marriage.
When I walked down the
aisle in 1972 there was just the usual Damsel
in Distress, with Prince Charming.
There were no children, no old girlfriends demanding financial restitution, or
former boyfriends seeking regular visitation time with our pets.
Original marriages
begin relatively unencumbered in that each partner arrives without a great deal
of [court
ordered]
baggage. There may be a wee hint of an old flame or two - perhaps a sibling we
still believed was dad’s favorite, or the memory of a former teacher who
announced in front of the entire fourth grade that you’d never learn to add
without using all of your fingers and toes…
Then again, perhaps Charming’s mother cooks everything from
scratch [complete with fruit trees and herb garden]
but Damsel has problems with the
glued tab on a box of dry cereal. Or – Damsel’s
father could repair anything developed by NASA, but for Charming the mechanics of a can opener remain a mystery...
No matter. On our first
matrimonial sojourn the faces of old flames fade. We set aside any perceptions
of parental favoritism, because we now have one person to focus on us exclusively.
[Memories
of that fourth grade teacher many not be so easy.] Anyway that aside,
except for a possible in-law factor only two people are in serious contention
when first we roll the dice.
Basically it’s a one to
one relationship. One marriage, one house, one set of children, one group of
grandparents, one collection of memories with one congregation of friends… You
get the picture. Everything we do the
first time is for the first time,
with one purpose – to ultimately grow old together as our preconditioning
dictates.
When that momentum
forward is derailed by a divorce everyone is thrown onto unfamiliar ground.
A divorce is not an
unemotional event because the original wedding was not an unemotional event. If
a marriage was more like a business merger then all original motives would be
clearly spelled out on paper, signed in ink – instead of verbal promises,
sealed with a kiss.
Divorce, with children
changes everything [almost] forever.
“Until death us do
part.” is between parents and offspring and that
pivotal factor continues to link us to a previous spouse, former in laws and
other family members. Why? Because - our
children didn’t divorce anyone…
When I ventured down
the aisle again in 1990 there was a substantial cast of extras. Besides Hero and Damsel the line-up included: his three children [one
who later joined us on our delayed honeymoon] and my two children.
There was his ex-wife who still expected child support, my ex-husband who still
expected child visitation, as well as the usual feature lineup of new
grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins and friends stirred in with the original
set of grandparents, relatives and old friends. Not even the cast of BEN-HUR had that kind of duplication!
Literally speaking only
three of our [blended] five offspring were
present at the actual ceremony and certainly neither of the ex-spouses
attended. However, everyone ‘was and still’ is very much a part of our lives
and that, is the central detour
between the private calm of our first matrimonial union and the near convention
like setting of round two [or three].
The reality of our
second time at bat is not dealing with duplicate appliances or garden equipment
– it is the multiple surnames and addresses, an abundance of grandparents,
numerous parents, an array of children with a profusion of additional relatives
and friends. It is fielding holidays you may or may not share together, because
his children are present while hers are with their father.
Remarriage
is rescheduled vacations re-juggled, rearranged, or cancelled completely because one ex-spouse is late
returning with one set of children while another ex-spouse won’t allow the
children to leave when it’s convenient for you – because it really isn’t convenient for them… And
these hurdles are truly quite minor.
………
When
Barbara married Adam each of them had sole custody of the biological children
from their first marriage. Barbara had two boys eight and ten years-old. Adam,
whose first wife was a recovering alcoholic, also had a son, who was nine.
Barbara
and Adam were both in their late thirties, professionally well respected and
emotionally present for their children. When they met they had a vision of
forming a new family that would begin to heal long smoldering, sensitive
wounds.
They
expected that Adam’s withdrawn son would begin to emerge from his closed
emotional shell with two brothers close to his age and a mother figure who was
not only sober, but involved.
They
hoped Barbara’s older son would become less hostile, exposed to the patient,
more stable example Adam could bring to the new home.
Barbara’s
boys almost missed the wedding ceremony because their dad claimed he had marked
the wrong date on his calendar.
Settling
in Adam and Barbara tried to arrange for all three boys to visit their
respective biological parents on the same weekend, twice each month, so they
could look forward to some private time. However…
About
two months into Adam and Barbara’s new marriage Barbara’s ex-husband suddenly
married a girlfriend, ten years his junior. After he returned from his
honeymoon [and
for three years thereafter]
he functioned in a pattern of missed child support payments, usually arrived
late to pick up the boys, often cancelled at the last minute, or didn’t show up
at all – maintaining business excuses.
Also,
a few months into Adam and Barbara’s new marriage, Adam’s ex-wife was
discharged from rehabilitation then petitioned the court to get sole custody of
their son. She was granted joint custody, but soon started drinking. Adam had
to return to court torequest
full custody again, but this time also seeking supervised visitation to protect
his son.
Remember
The Brady Bunch?
Well – they had [besides a live in
house keeper] a script to follow, while the rest of us are pretty well working without a net…TO ORDER THIS BOOK: https://www.amazon.com/Another-Blended-Not-Shaken-Remarriage-Children-ebook/dp/B01CRIZQBA/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=sherrie+l+todd&qid=1579461292&s=books&sr=1-1
http://www.patchworkpublishing.com/
In one of my other chapters; CART BEFORE THE HORSE I highlight three typical stages experienced by most remarrying single-again-parents: 1. "The Fantasy Stage" that begins with the second marriage proposal and can end as soon as all respective offspring and ex-spouses are told of the impending new nuptials-or-the day after everyone has moved in together...When day to day living together brings reality colliding with those euphoric and ever so slightly flawed daydreams - comes the Panic Stage... 2. "The Panic Stage sets in with just about everything we had envisioned as being wonderful in the Fantasy Stage scattered around us as if we left the lid off a blender. We over analyze every event, blow simple incidents out of proportion and generally act like ninnies. When 'balance' between Fantasy and Panic is established - life slowly evolves to a place where the new players have begun to 'know' each other... 3. "The Reason Stage" arrives when we establish that neither our fantasies nor our panic had any foundation. Then we begin a pro-active approach that focuses 5seconds on the problem and 55seconds on a solution - not the reverse. At the Reason Stage photo albums emerge with pictures that include everyone that remind new family members of shared events that become shared memories of the new unit...
ReplyDelete